

Google updates Search constantly, but only a small slice of changes are publicly confirmed as named rollouts (Core updates, Spam updates, etc.).
For decision-making, those confirmed rollouts are the ones you can anchor timelines and expectations around. Google publishes them on the Search Status Dashboard.
Let’s break the numbers down by theme, using the most current confirmed data available as of February 2026.
From Google’s Search Status Dashboard (Ranking incidents), 2025 included:
So, 2025 had 3 Core updates + 1 Spam update confirmed.
What this really means is: early 2026 has already logged meaningful surfacing changes (Discover), even before a 2026 Core update is publicly confirmed.
A practical stat people ignore: update rollouts can last 2 to 4 weeks, and during that window, rankings can swing multiple times.
Here are the confirmed rollout durations (2025):
Decision takeaway: If you make major changes mid-rollout, you can confuse your own diagnosis. Treat rollouts like a storm window: stabilize tracking first, then act.
Different datasets measure impact differently, but some consistent patterns show up across credible industry tracking.
Search Engine Land cited data providers showing that over 16% of URLs in the top 10 after the June 2025 Core Update weren’t in the top 20 before the update, and that this was unusually high compared to recent years.
What that means: Google wasn’t just reordering the same pages. It promoted a noticeable chunk of “new” pages into the top results.
One large SERP analysis reported:
Even if you don’t treat those exact percentages as universal, the pattern is the point: core updates can create both sudden losses and unexpected breakouts.
Google’s own framing of core updates is that they’re regular improvements to better surface relevant, satisfying content.
In practice, core updates tend to:
Google publicly documented an August 2025 spam update and positions spam updates as enforcement of spam policies.
And enforcement around spam policy has been a major industry talking point, including “site reputation abuse” (often discussed as parasite SEO), even reaching regulatory complaints in Europe.
Both can be true:
Decision takeaway: build your process around confirmed rollouts, but monitor volatility year-round because unconfirmed shifts still move the ground.
Here’s a clean decision framework that prevents knee-jerk SEO:
Use a simple 3-way split:
A. Confirmed rollout window
If Google’s dashboard shows a rollout during your drop window, assume “algo weather” first.
B. No confirmed rollout, but high SERP volatility
Then you treat it as an unconfirmed shakeup: watch closely, don’t rewrite the site in panic.
C. No rollout, no volatility
More likely: technical issue, tracking problem, indexing, migration, internal linking, cannibalization, or competition.
Use thresholds:
Why this works: Core updates can reshuffle a meaningful share of the top results (example: June 2025’s top 10 churn and December 2025’s drop-off stats).
Given rollouts commonly last 2 to 3+ weeks, set rules:
Because spam rollouts can run long (example: 26+ days in Aug 2025), keep a portion of your roadmap reserved for cleanup and compliance: affiliate footprints, thin content, scaled low-value pages, and reputation abuse risks.
Prediction for 2026: Google keeps the cadence of roughly 2 to 4 major confirmed rollouts a year, but the real story is heavier churn in the top results and more aggressive enforcement around trust and policy, especially for sites scaling content without clear first-hand value.